ocampo39_Erik McGregorPacific PressLightRocket via Getty Images_taxprotestUS

让那些跨国企业和富人掏钱出来

Jun 30, 2020 José Antonio Ocampo , Tommaso Faccio

发自纽约—— 新型冠状病毒疫情将令世界经济遭受重创，而错误的税收政策则会在短期内加剧损失并阻碍长期复苏。

危机才刚爆发几个月，公共部门的资产负债表就已经承受了巨大的压力。鉴于封锁措施和其他社会隔离规则减少了经济活动，许多发达国家政府已经启动了大规模货币和财政刺激措施。再加上税收收入暴跌和失业率飙升，政府的未来支出还将急剧上涨。

而发展中国家的前景则尤为黯淡，因为许多发展中国家缺乏实施刺激的财政空间，也担心一旦尝试刺激就会引发资本外逃。一些人甚至鼓吹财政紧缩，但该政策很可能会让重启经济和补充政府财政的愿望化为泡影。

To continue reading, register now.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to Project Syndicate

Enjoy unlimited access to the ideas and opinions of the world’s leading thinkers, including long reads, book reviews, topical collections, short-form analysis and predictions, and exclusive interviews; every new issue of the PS Quarterly magazine (print and digital); the complete PS archive; and more. Subscribe now to PS Premium.

José Antonio Ocampo

Writing for PS since 2006
51 Commentaries

José Antonio Ocampo, a former finance minister of Colombia and United Nations under-secretary-general, is a professor at Columbia University, Chair of the UN Committee for Development Policy, and Chair of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation. He is the author of Resetting the International Monetary (Non)System (Oxford University Press, 2017) and co-author (with Luis Bértola) of The Economic Development of Latin America since Independence (Oxford University Press, 2012).

Tommaso Faccio

Writing for PS since 2020
3 Commentaries

Tommaso Faccio is Lecturer in Accounting at Nottingham University Business School and Head of the Secretariat of the Independent Commission for the Reform of International Corporate Taxation.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 4 Comments on this article

Robert REYNOLDS Jul 6, 2020

Jose and Tommaso certainly make many relevant points here and advocate many long overdue reforms which one should expect any worthwhile social democratic party to support.

However, as contributor Michael Public indicates below, taxing these multinational behemoths is not going to be an easy task. Apart from the influence that they exert on politicians, there is also the fact that if governments seek to impose taxation measures upon them which they really do not like, then these corporations will have no compunction about threatening governments with canceling services or moving their operations offshore completely. Such threats would not be made in an idle way, In other words, in pursuit of their profits, they will be quite prepared to hold whole countries to ransom.

The capitalist robber barons' bluff must be called when this tactic is used. Their businesses must be nationalized or alternatively, publically owned corporations must be established to replace them that are designed to be transparent and to operate in the interests of the community. That is where the real challenge lies.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
shayre Jun 30, 2020

Sukh's Thoughts: The changes recommended here could have been made at any time over the last 20 years, if not before that.

The only reason that they will now be implemented is the fact that the benefits of hegemony and globalization that the developed world enjoyed are now coming to an end. It was pragmatic to allow developed-world multinationals to avoid taxes while developed-world-led globalization ran its course. When this exorbitant privilege came to its eventual, unavoidable end, ONLY THEN would the developed world "see the light" and realize that they can easily tax multi-nationals by assuming that any company's profits are in proportion to the revenues generated in that country. AND, if the corporation does not like the tax rules, they are free to leave.

The void they leave will be almost instantaneously filled by a new or existing provider of the same services more than willing to pay the taxes required (for the opportunity to basically take over an existing business at no cost).
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Michael Public Jun 30, 2020

Above, the author writes an important article for the citizens of Lala Land, where politicians are not bought by business, where super PACCs don't exist and lobbying is punished by death. /sarcasm font off.

You are right that this needs to change, but nothing is what is going to happen, because those in who make the rules are fed by big business - and only fools bite the hand that feeds.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Michael Public Jun 30, 2020

These days it is not so simple. For example, Google pay Apple USD 1 billion every year for them to use their search engine. Presumably google make USD 2 billion in revenue off this payment or they would not do it. Tax the revenue at 25% and add other running costs such as developers at $300 000 to $600 000 pa and you get a loss.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.